At least we get a laugh from time to time, ” Gambling Freak Gets on Betfair Exchange and Snatches £300 a Week Using a Method He Swears Under Oath is Not Illegal”
Anyone with any savvy would have moved on after reading that headline , I mean where do these guys get these from and I also know from the bonuses / upsells that are part of this package that the people selling this system also own the bettingsystemreviews website which is quite interesting because I see they have it listed for review.
Nine pages long is the manual and one positive is that it is fluff free. I don’t like giving methods away, but this system really is inconclusive due to the fact that a/ no past results are available and b/ it is possible that everyone could obtain different selections. In essence, this system revolves around going to oddschecker and see what horses have been big market movers, if they have steamed and meet a certain criteria then they are to be backed.
Certainly not my cup of tea and a system in which I believe would be more miss than hit.
To see the catchy headline click here
Quite surprised to read your condemnation of this system without, seemingly, testing it.
More Money Review – plus a good number of their readers – appear to have made respectable profits using the system, averaging around 20 points a month.
I bought the system a week ago (based on the MMR review) and having studied it I don’t see how you can say that it is possible that everyone could get different selections. If the system rules are followed exactly then the selections couldn’t help but be the same for everyone.
I have only used it for three days so far and I am 3 points up. Nothing exciting to be sure, but profit is profit. Whether I will acheive 20 points over a month remains to be seen.
My point is, if the method doesn’t appeal to you, then that is just a matter of personal preference, but I don’t think it is right to fail a system without trying it first.
Hi Brian thanks for the comment, my problem is that I cannont recommend it based on what I see in the manual, for example where are the past results, what if I check at a slightly different time to you, surely the selections I get could be different?
Hi Sam
I take your point about the lack of past results, though given the selection method I suspect it would be very difficult to cross check.
As for the selection timing – well, the manual does specifically state 2.00pm. I have absolutely no idea what the reasoning is behind that, but – at least so far – it seems to work.
I think my main issue really is that it’s a big jump from not recommending a system to actually placing it firmly on the failed list. Perhaps a ‘no comment’ and just leave it at that might have been more appropriate.
You may well turn out to be right about this, I can only wait and see how things go. I’ll let you know.
By the way – I totally agree with you about the attempted upselling; it is truly atrocious.
Hi Brian, when I started this site I had a neutral type category but a few months down the line I removed it because I thought it was pointless because in my opinion I can either use something to make money or I can’t and in that sense it is either pass or fail . My issue is that the 2:00 thing, I mean if someone checks at 1:55 or 2:05 will they get the same bets as someone bang on the nose at 2pm, maybe a bit picky I know but perhaps, if you are using this full time at the moment you might be intersted in recording your results on the website?