TEST FINISHED THIS GOES IN THE SCRAPHEAP
Time to call this one a day after 30 days. The same number of days as 2009 for the May results. There is some sense in the e/w double as a profitable bet but not, I am sad to say, Mr Hibbert’s bets. I would suggest you develop your own criteria. I played with it and for the last week came up with a selection method that gave me one winning double one place double and one losing double. 3 bets across 3 separate days with a £203 profit.
1. Last years results only qualified by Mr Hibbert himself and do not fit his system criteria in many instances. You can form your own opinions about the efficacy of last years results and sportsworld systems.
2. Last year there were 19 bets with 11 giving a return totalling £695 – this year 8 bets with two giving a return but still a loss of -£0.25. The remaining six lost £120
3. Last years average price on the results which gave a return was = 3.34 this years average was = 1.7.
The results speak for themselves and a dismal failure. Some of the criteria should be questioned such as backing tipsters naps. The racing proofing tables tells you how well these bets do and even worse how often the price crashes on these selections.
I wil give the system 1 out 5 because with work you could turn this system using your own criteia into a potentially winning formula.
The salespage for One Good Bet is here
Well done on the test Jim and I can sense your disapointment and yet another Sportsworld promoted failure to add to an impressive internet wide failure list of which I have tested a few and is no real surprise that this one too ends up where it deserves to be.
From one who has purchased a B. Hibbert “gem” from Sportsworld, I’m not surprised at the outcome of this one. It seems that too many people are getting hurt by S.world with their so called systems. You’re doing a fantastic job at ORR, keep up the good work.